Well no duh they need celebrities to judge the show or else nobody will bother watching, but they need people that actually know what they're talking about.....
BB.

Britney can only give advice on the entertainment/performance side of it because she can't sing a freakin' note anymore.
At least on The Voice you have people like Adam Levine and Christina who actually sing LIVE (though I can't stand the way Xtina sings but she's still miles better than Britney).
Remember when AI hired Ellen DeGeneres as a judge, even though she knew nothing about music? She was only there for comic relief and to represent the "general public's opinion." She lasted for 1 season. You need a balance somewhere- someone who actually knows what they're talking about, but also makes the show interesting to watch. I'm sure Britney knows
some things given she's been in the industry for so long, but at the same time you've got people behind her doing all this stuff
for her. She looks like a robot when she performs on stage. I don't believe she comes up with any choreography for her tours on her own, on the last album didn't write any of the songs (except Scary which didn't make the cut), barely sings and when she does it sounds terrible, barely dances anymore, etc. She relies on background dancers who dance better than she does, weird costumes, props, and sexy dancing to distract from how poor her performing ability has become. Who wants advice from someone like that? If she gave me advice about singing or something, I'd just smile and nod but probably wouldn't take her criticisms very seriously.
On the other hand, if I were given advice by Adam or Steven Tyler, their criticisms would be more legit because they are actual musicians- they are actually involved in what they do to a much greeter extent than Britney. If I want to be a manufactured robotic pop tart like Briney, sure I'll listen to her. But if I want to be a real musician, I'm not gonna take her seriously. Get the difference?
Bookmarks